The Evidence of God
I was once full of confidence that Darwinism justified my
atheism. I felt I had investigated the issue sufficiently,
having studied biology, chemistry, geology, anthropology, and
other sciences. No doubt about it, natural selection acting on
random variation had put God out of a job
But then I began to go beyond the obvious, to set aside my
prejudices, to ask questions I had never posed before, and to
pursue the clues of science and history wherever they led.
Instead of letting naturalism limit my search, I opened myself
to the full range of possibilities.
Frankly, I wasn't prepared for what would happen.
The facts of science systematically eroded the foundation of
Darwinism until it could no longer support the weight of my
atheistic conclusions. After two years of intensive scientific
research I came to a startling conclusion the data of the
physical world points powerfully toward the existence of a
Creator.
POSSIBILITY #1: DARWIN
As I considered the evidence afresh, I tried to honestly
weigh which hypothesis, Darwinism or Design, best accounted for
the most current data of science.
Looking at the doctrine of Darwinism, which under-girded my
atheism for so many years, it didn't take me long to conclude
that it was simply too far-fetched to be credible. I would have
to believe that:
- Nothing produces everything
- Non-life produces life
- Randomness produces fine-tuning
- Chaos produces information
- Unconsciousness produces consciousness
- Non-reason produces reason
Based on this, I was forced to conclude that Darwinism would
require a blind leap of faith that I was not willing to make.
The central pillars of evolutionary theory quickly rotted away
when exposed to scrutiny. For example, naturalistic processes
have utterly failed to explain how non-living chemicals could
somehow self-assemble into the first living cell.
In addition, the overall fossil record has stubbornly refused
to confirm the grand claim of Darwinian transitions. The
majority or, according to some experts, all of the world's forty
phyla, the highest in the animal kingdom, virtually sprang forth
with unique body plans more than five hundred million years ago.
The sudden appearance of these radically new life forms, devoid
of prior transitions, has turned Darwin's Tree of Life on its
head.
POSSIBILITY #2: DESIGN
One has to consider many different issues and see whether
they point toward or away from the existence of an intelligent
designer. Consider some of the evidence that was adduced in my
investigation:
The Evidence of Cosmology
As described by William Lane Craig, the argument is simple
yet elegant: first, whatever begins to exist has a
cause....second, the universe had a beginning....therefore, the
universe has a cause. Even once-agnostic astronomer Robert
Jastrow conceded the essential elements of Christianity and
modern cosmology are the same: The chain of events leading to
man commenced suddenly and sharply...
The Evidence of Physics
One of the most striking discoveries of modern science has
been that the laws and constants of physics unexpectedly
conspire in an extraordinary way to make the universe habitable
for life. For instance, physicist-philosopher Robin Collins has
said, "gravity is fine-tuned to one part in a hundred million
billion billion billion billion billion."
The Evidence of Astronomy
Similar to the fine-tuning of physics, Earth's position in
the universe and its intricately choreographed geological and
chemical processes work together with exquisite efficiency to
create a safe place for humans to live. "If the universe had not
been made with the most exacting precision, we could never have
come into existence," said Harvard-educated astrophysicist John
A. O'Keefe of NASA. "It is my view that these circumstances
indicate the universe was created for man to live in."
The Evidence of Biochemistry
Darwin said, "If it could be demonstrated that any complex
organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by
numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would
absolutely break down." Biochemist Michael Behe has demonstrated
exactly that through his description of irreducibly complex
molecular machines.
These complicated, microscopic contraptions, such as cilia
and bacterial flagella, are extremely unlikely to have been
built piece-by-piece through Darwinian processes because they
had to be fully present in order to function. Other examples
include the incredible system of transporting proteins within
cells and the intricate process of blood-clotting.
The Evidence of Biological Information
The six feet of DNA coiled inside every one of our body's one
hundred trillion cells contains a four-letter chemical alphabet
that spells out precise assembly instructions for all the
proteins from which our bodies are made. Whenever we find a
sequential arrangement that's complex and corresponds to an
independent pattern or function (books, computer code, DNA),
this kind of information always implies an intelligent source.
The Evidence of Consciousness
Many scientists are concluding that the laws of chemistry and
physics cannot explain our experience of consciousness.
Professor J. P. Moreland defined consciousness as our
introspection, sensations, thoughts, emotions etc. that make us
alive and aware. He said, "You can't get something from
nothing." If the universe began with dead matter having no
conscience, "how then, do you get something totally different
conscious, living, thinking, feeling creatures from materials
that don't have that?"
THE IDENTITY OF THE DESIGNER
In my opinion, the findings from cosmology and physics by
themselves were sufficient to support the design hypotheses. All
the other data simply built a more powerful case. But who or
what is this master Designer? Each scientific principle
contributes some clues to unmasking the Creator's identity.
Physics suggests the Creator is intelligent and involved.
Astronomy shows the Creator is incredibly precise, implying
care, concern and purpose. Biochemistry and Biological
Information demonstrate the Creator is... creative.
Consciousness shows the Creator's rationality, which suggests
omnipresence and the credibility of life after death.
These characteristics do not describe the god of deism, who
supposedly formed the universe but then abandoned it. Nor is it
pantheism, the idea that the Creator and universe are
co-existent. Polytheism with its multiple gods falls short, as
does the impersonal force of New Age beliefs. In contrast,
however, the portrait of the Creator that emerges from the
scientific data is uncannily consistent with the description of
the God whose identity is spelled out in the pages of the Bible.
As the apostle Paul wrote two millennia ago: "For since the
creation of the world God's invisible qualities his eternal
power and divine nature have been clearly seen, being understood
from what has been made [that is, his creation], so that men are
without excuse" (Romans 1:20).
The question of whether these qualities might also describe
the deities of any other world religions became moot once I
added the evidence that I discovered through the study of
ancient history and archaeology (see author's book, The Case for
Christ).
With Darwinism, my faith would have to swim upstream against
the strong current of evidence flowing the other way. But
putting my trust in the God of the Bible was nothing less than
the most rational and natural decision I could have made.
I was merely permitting the torrent of facts to carry me to
their most logical conclusion.
FAITH & RESPONSE
I see faith as a reasonable step in the same direction that
the evidence is pointing. Faith goes beyond merely acknowledging
that the facts of science and history point toward God. Faith is
responding to those facts by investing trust in God a step
that's fully warranted due to the supporting evidence.
When we decide not merely to ponder the abstract concept of a
designer but to embrace him as our own to make him our "true
god" then we can meet him personally, relate to him daily, and
spend eternity with him as he promises.
If you're a spiritual skeptic or a seeker, I hope you'll
resolve to investigate the evidence for yourself, and then
respond accordingly.
First, is there a God who created the universe?
Second, did God reveal himself to humankind through the
Bible?
Third, is Jesus the Son of God deity united with humanity and
can he help us as he claimed?
You'll soon find that the universe is governed by both
physical laws and spiritual laws. The physical laws point us
toward the Creator; the spiritual laws tell us how we can know
him personally, both today and forever.
Lee Strobel
Bible references: NIV Taken from The Case for a Creator, by
Lee P. Strobel. ©2004 Used by permission of The Zondervan
Corporation.
Photo by NewsCom Printed in USA ©2004
ISBN# 1-55837-983-6
41608 |