Mad ScientistAlate_One (make-believer), leaning on her own understanding daily (Pr 3:5).  Failing to glorify God for what he has done in his work of creation (Re 4:11).

Deceiving in the classroom:  It would be better for him if a millstone were hung around his neck and he were thrown into the sea than for him to cause one of these little ones to stumble (Lk 17:2).

 

For this they willfully forget, that there were heavens from of old, and an earth compacted out of water and amidst water, by the word of God (2 Pe 3:5).  The word of God, which also works in you who believe (1 Th 2:13).  

 

O Timothy! Guard what was committed to your trust, avoiding the profane and idle babblings and contradictions of what is falsely called knowledge— by professing it some have strayed concerning the faith. The New King James Version. 1982 (1 Ti 6:20–21). Nashville: Thomas Nelson.

 

"Theistic evolution may be defined as an anesthetic which deadens the patient's pain while atheism removes his religion." —William Jennings Bryan

 

[Introduction of his book Evolution Exposed Biology by Roger Patterson] "This book is dedicated to all of those who have been deceived by evolutionary philosophies in the classrooms across the world, especially those student to whom I presented evolution as the only scientific explanation during my years as a teacher...I...thank God for the talents and courage He has provided me to speak out against the evolutionary indoctrination of our youth."

 

"What I do not do, is teach science without explaining to people that students do not have to damage or give up their faith (Alate_One)." Alate One deceives students in the classroom (Ro 1:21-22).  

 

DevilBeware lest anyone 5cheat you through philosophy and empty deceit, according to ithe tradition of men, according to the jbasic principles of the world, and not according to Christ

5 Lit. plunder you or take you captive.

i Gal. 1:14

j Gal. 4:3, 9, 10; Col. 2:20

The New King James Version. Nashville : Thomas Nelson, 1982, S. Col 2:8

 

, Although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful, but fbecame futile in their thoughts, and their foolish hearts were darkened.
f 2 Kin. 17:15; Jer. 2:5; Eph. 4:17
The New King James Version. Nashville : Thomas Nelson, 1982, S. Ro 1:21

 

fu•tile \ˈfyü-təl, ˈfyü-ˌtī(-ə)l\ adj
[MF or L; MF, fr. L futilis brittle, pointless, prob. fr. fu- (akin to fundere to pour) — more at found] ca. 1555
1           serving no useful purpose completely ineffective 〈efforts to convince him were futile
2           occupied with trifles frivolousfu•tile•ly \-təl-(l)ē, -ˌtī(-ə)l-lē\ adv fu•tile•ness \-təl-nəs, -ˌtī(-ə)l-nəs\ n
syn futile, vain, fruitless mean producing no result. futile may connote completeness of failure or unwisdom of undertaking 〈resistance had proved so futile that surrender was the only choice left〉. vain usu. implies simple failure to achieve a desired result 〈a vain attempt to get the car started〉. fruitless comes close to vain but often suggests long and arduous effort or severe disappointment 〈fruitless efforts to obtain a lasting peace〉.
\
\ə\ abut \ə\ kitten, F table \ər\ further \a\ ash \ā\ ace \ä\ mop, mar
\au̇\ out \ch\ chin \e\ bet \ē\ easy \g\ go \i\ hit \ī\ ice \j\ job
\ŋ\ sing \ō\ go \ȯ\ law \ȯi\ boy \th\ thin \ṯẖ\ the \ü\ loot \\ foot
\y\ yet \zh\ vision, beige \ḵ, n, œ, ue, y\ see Guide to Pronunciation
adj adjective
MF Middle French
fr from
L Latin
prob probably
ca circa
adv adverb
n northern, noun
Merriam-Webster, Inc: Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary. Eleventh ed. Springfield, Mass. : Merriam-Webster, Inc., 2003

 

 

"In 2 Timothy 4:2b, we are commanded to 'Be ready in season and out of season.  convince, rebuke, exhort, with all longsuffering and teaching.'

 

...'whether the opportunity seems to be favorable or unfavorable.  [Whether it is convenient or inconvenient, whether it is welcome or unwelcome, you as preacher of the Word are to show people in what way their lives are wrong.]'...

 

'For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine, but according to their own desires, because they have itching ear, they will heap up for themselves teacher.'

 

...[T]he Amplified Bible can provide a detailed commentary on the content presented in this verse:

 

For the time is coming when [people] will not tolerate (endure) sound and wholesome instruction, but having ears itching [for something pleasing and gratifying], they will gather to themselves one teacher after another to considerable number, chosen to satisfy their own liking and to foster the errors they hold..." Demolishing Strongholds Series.

 

Alate One believes in:  Theistic Evolution, Local Flood Theory, "Framework Hypothesis". 

 

See:

 

Terms

Contradictions Between the Biblical and the Secular View

Faulty Thinking Process Employed by Many Christians

The Bible Is Clear: Adam Was a Historical Person

The Bible and Evolution—Mixed Messages

Why I Believe in 24-Hour Days

Did God Use Evolution?

Old-Earth Creationism—Is It a Sin to Be Wrong?

Bill Nye’s Crusade for Your Kids

Why Orthodox Darwinism Demands Atheism

Theistic Evolution: An Incoherent and Inconsistent Worldview?

Understanding the Nature of Scripture, of Jesus, and the “Dis-Ease” of Theistic Evolutionists (BioLogos)

Can Theistic Evolutionism Explain the Origin of Morality?

The Importance of an Historical Adam

Crazy...feather problem

 

Trust in the LORD with all your heart and lean not on your own understanding (Pr 3:5).  Those who hear the gospel but do nothing with it remain in unbelief and go to hell. "He who rejects Me and does not receive My sayings, has one who judges him; the word I spoke is what will judge him at the last day (Jn 12:48, NASB)." It is the word that you have not accepted which condemns you in the last day. You hear His words and reject, which is literally "to count them as nothing" in the original language. Everlasting life is not based on performance it is believing the word of God. The word is eternal life. It's believing Jesus Christ. "What I speak, therefore, I speak just as the Father has told me (Jn 12:50, ISV)."

 

See:

 

My God would never send me to hell

 

"Pterosaurs [are]...distantly related to crocodiles (Alate_One)."

 

"Even the untrained eye can see the archeopteryx skeleton looks more similar to theropods than it does to the highly modified skeleton of modern birds (Alate_One)... "

 

"There is no neck problem for the evolution of giraffes (Alate_One)."
 

"Dawkins is...fairly good at explaining science (Alate_One)."

 

"The common ancestor probably looked a lot like a chimpanzee. Ardi...(Alate_One)."

 

"I said we are monkeys . . . . The anatomical difference between humans and monkeys is minimal (Alate_One)."3D Monkey

"We all came from monkeys....[I]f you go back far enough, everyone was black and everyone is ultimately from Africa (Alate_One)."

 

"Coevolution is common. Too common and too specific to be explained by God magically "poofing" every relationship into being 6000 years ago and then almost everything being wiped out by a flood (Alate_One)."

 

 "Scientific theories are virtually never overturned (Alate_One)..."

 

[Is evolution a theory or a fact?] "It is both. That evolution (change of organisms over time) has occurred is a fact (Alate_One)..."

 

"YEC promoters like Morris are despised by rational Christians [Alate_One claiming to be one] as misguided and sometimes outright liars (Alate_One)." Grrr

"I despise creationists that make their view of creation into a burden upon men's souls (as Morris did)." Alate_One.

 

 "...[A] truly global flood didn't happen (Alate_One)."

 

"...[T]hat includes single celled organisms...Typical SD...retorts with Biblical texts...(Alate_One)."

 

"It's impossible for the "sun to stand still" in a literal sense and have the effect intended (Alate_One)."

 

[You either believe the Bible is the inspired word of God or you do not (2 Ti 3:16). Which is it?] "That's not at all what early Christians or Jews believed. There were different "levels" of inspiration. It also depends on what you mean by inspired (Alate_One)."

Is the Bible scientifically wrong?] "It's not a science textbook. It reflects the science of the time it was written in (Alate_One)."

 

[Do you believe the Bible contains errors? If so, who made the error? God or the writer?] "The writers were still flawed human beings like you and I. God did not choose to correct the science because it would have caused confusion for centuries of the hearers rather than understanding (Alate_One)."

 

"...[S]cience isn't important for the gospel message...(Alate_One)."

 

"...[I]t's merely part of the cultural landscape of the writer...(Alate_One)."

 

"Your problem is you actually place so much value on scientific knowledge that you feel the Bible must be scientifically accurate or it is useless (Alate_One)."

 

"Consider for a moment that the Bible is not designed to teach science at all, nor was it held to a standard of scientific perfection (though it does reflect simple observational accuracy)...[Alate_One]."

 

[Not problem texts/problem texts] "They have the same "problems" that Genesis 1 has, an ancient understanding of the universe...(Alate_One)."

 

"You believe dirt turned into people, dinosaurs lived with people and DNA just knows to magically change itself in a coordinated fashion in response to the environment. All of this in the face of zero evidence (aside from a picture someone made in the 1st century AD).  I don't think your characterization of anyone else's scientific ideas [biblical writers] have any value at all (Alate_One)."

"There's no "science" or "natural knowledge" in there [2 Ti 3:16].  In righteousness, good works . . .where do you find science in there? (Alate_One)"

[The Bible is scientifically inaccurate?] "In terms of a modern standard yes...I don't see anything wrong with God using the "science of the day" (Alate_One)."

[The Bible is simplistic?] "In some senses and books yes in others not. The Gospel itself message needs to be simple, otherwise is God only appealing to the learned and intelligent?"

[What do you think of (Ps 12:6)? Is the Bible perfect? Pr 30:5? Is the Bible pure?] "The Bible isn't purely "the words of God". There is history, poetry, and examples of bad behavior (Alate_One)."

[Who should we trust? Ourselves? Or the word of God? Jn 6:67-69.] "Shouldn't we trust that God left us a record in His creation and that it actually makes sense?  (Alate_One)."

[The Bible can only instruct us in righteousness and good works?] "Do you want it to tell you about something else? It does touch on history (Alate_One)."

[God had to learn from modern scientists?] "God knows all the answers, science is just our attempt to discover what God already knows. I see no reason that God is obligated to tell us everything about science, engineering etc. in the Bible, however (Alate_One)."

 

"This is Christianity not 6 days of Creationianity or globalfloodianity (Alate_One)."

 

["Thus, Genesis 1:1 can legitimately and incisively be paraphrased as follows: “The transcendent, omnipotent Godhead called into existence the space-mass-time universe.” Morris, Henry M.: The Genesis Record : A Scientific and Devotional Commentary on the Book of Beginnings. Grand Rapids, MI : Baker Books, 1976, S. 39] "...[T]hat'd be a reasonable description of the big bang."

 

AlligatorWere dinosaurs really created on Day 6?  Did death and disease come before or after Adam's sin?  When was the first death?  Does observational science deal directly with the past?  If you deny biblical teaching doesn't that make you a humanist?  Do you trust in God's truth or your own truth?  Do you believe God's revelation or man's speculation?  Does soft tissue survive after 65 million years?  Can you give one example of a transitional creature (e.g. amphibian to reptile, or reptile to dinosaur) to substantiate your argument?  Do you have any evidence that dinosaurs evolved into birds?  Did man's relationship with creation and animals change after the fall as the Bible said it did?  Did men live with dinosaurs?  If one accepts your atheistic evolutionary teaching, how can they know right from wrong?  Why do attempt to destroy the foundations of the Bible?  If you claim that bloodshed occurred before the fall of Adam, isn't that an attack on the gospel?  Why did Jesus have to die on the cross?  Is the Bible wrong?  Is the Bible relevant?  Does it have real meaning? Can people trust it from the first verse?  On what basis can you say that you stand with God?  On what basis can you claim that you are not in rebellion against his word?  On what basis can you claim to have believed?  Would you say that you neglect and reject the truth of scripture?  Is it sin not to believe God's word?  Can you say you have heeded his word?  Do you thank him for salvation and then tell him his word is wrong?  Can you love the Lord in error?  Do you still accept death, bloodshed and disease before Adam's sin?  Either evolution is true or Christianity is true--which is it? 

 

See:

 

What Really Happened to the Dinosaurs? 

 

Challenge for Alate_One--take this questionnaire.   Please let the reader know when you do start believing God? Faith believes God (Heb 11:1). Do you believe God (Jn 14:1), Christ (Jn 6:29; Ac 20:21), the writings of Moses (Jn 5:46; Ac 24:14), the prophets (2Ch 20:20; Ac 26:27) and the gospel (Mr 1:15)? On what basis do you call yourself a Christian? ...crickets...Roach

...And More

 

Alate One does not have a biblical worldview.

 

See:

 

The Theological Battlefront

 

...Much is at stake, even the issue of biblical inerrancy. Can God's Word be trusted? When it gives times and places and genealogies, does it contain meaningful information? To Christian old-earth advocates, many Scripture passages must be ignored or allegorized (Morris)."

 

See:

 

An excerpt: The Young Earth: The Real History of the Earth--Past, Present, and Future by John Morris

 

A Word of Warning to Uniformitarian Scoffers

 

The Battle for the Beginning

 

Should Genesis be taken literally?

 

Special Feature: Hugh Ross Exposé by Ken Ham

 

The Dirty Little Secret Is Out: Religious Faith and Evolution Are Incompatible