[Arizona sheriff finds Obama presidential
qualifications forged by Dianna Cotter] "On
April 27, 2011, President Barack walked into
the White House Press room with a Cheshire
cat like grin and a "Long Form Birth
Certificate" from the State of Hawaii in
hand. From the podium in the press room, Mr.
Obama said, "We're not going to be able to
solve our problems if we get distracted by
sideshows and carnival barkers,". Quite the
barb from a man holding a forged document.
That's right, forged.
The president himself created the scene; one
filled laughter from an adoring press corp.,
a scene of unprecedented fanfare while
holding a forged document which was later
posted on the White House website. This was
the news Sheriff Arpaio revealed on March 1,
2012 in Arizona...
...[A]n issue which cannot be brushed aside
by Mr. Obama. His father, Barack Obama Sr.
was a student from the British Commonwealth
of Kenya, a British Citizen who never sought
to become a US Citizen, and indeed was
eventually forced to leave the country. Mr.
Obama has only one parent who was an
American Citizen. Obama clearly does not
meet the requirements of Natural Born
Citizen as defined by the Supreme Court in
Minor v. Happersett...
...So the efforts to obfuscate Obama's
citizenship issues began in earnest. The
plan was deviously simple, make certain that
people focused on his Hawaiian documents,
and minimize the visibility of Minor V.
Happersett and Citizenship to the public...
...A child born in Hawaii, regardless of
whether or not they were born in the state
and subject to the Jurisdiction of the
United States, automatically gained US
Citizenship. This is the only state in the
United States where this condition existed.
This is why Hawaii is so vitally important
to Obama, and could explain why it is
important enough to forge birth documents
for. It is why Obama's birth is being
alleged to have occurred there instead of
somewhere like Washington State or
elsewhere, and is so vitally important...
...Months before the election of 2008 Barack
Obama began deliberately directing public
attention to his Hawaiian Records. The Obama
campaign, before redirecting the site to
"Attack Watch" maintained the "Fight the
Smears" website which can still be found on
archival websites. The Obama campaign posted
the candidate's "short Form" birth
certificate with the following information
from FactCheck.com:
"When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,
1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British
colony, still part of the United Kingdom's
dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack
Obama Sr. was a British subject whose
citizenship status was governed by The
British Nationality Act of 1948. That same
act governed the status of Obama Sr.'s
children.
Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his
U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of
allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship
automatically expired on Aug. 4, 1982."
The campaign obviously wanted public
attention directed at his birth documents in
Hawaii.
The campaign itself created the entire birth
certificate controversy, and acted to
maintain and fan the flames of that
controversy for several truly simple
reasons. As long as the public was wondering
about what being born under "the British
Nationality Act of 1948" meant, and the
birth certificate "birther" controversy in
general, they were not looking into laws
which would have legally prevented the
senator from assuming the role of candidate
and then President. Legal cases such as
Minor V. Happersett.
This case was, and still is, of tremendous
import. Had it been found during the
campaign it would have prevented his
candidacy, certainly preventing him from
taking the oath of office in Jan 2009.
So a campaign to hide Minor V. Happersett
was undertaken at the same time...
...Justia.com is owned by Obama supporter
Tim Stanley, and began a systematic
scrubbing of Minor V. Happersett in the
summer of 2008, erasing the name and
specific text quoted from the case, along
with specific citations to it out of dozens
of Supreme Court cases which cited it over
138 years of American Supreme Court History.
The controversy was dubbed "JustiaGate"...
...Justia erased "Minor v. Happersett" along
with text quoted from the case out of its
Supreme Court servers deliberately in an
effort to minimize the ability of the public
to find the case by searching for it,
significantly reducing its apparent
importance.
These two separate efforts, raising the
profile of the Senator's birth certificate
in as controversial a manner as possible,
while minimizing the legal role of Minor v.
Happersett succeeded. Barack Obama was able
to illegally win the election, and illegally
take office. It was stolen right in front of
the American public...
Law enforcement has found his birth
documents to be "highly suspect" as a
forgery. His draft card has similarly been
found by law enforcement as being "highly
suspect" as a forgery. The smoke screen
cover created by his birth certificate,
hiding Minor v. Happersett in a shadow of
false mockery, has been blown away. Leaving
the Supreme Court case alone on the stage,
glaringly exposing Barack Obama as an
usurper, an unconstitutional President of
the United States.
The American Press is deliberately hiding
the evidence published on the internet about
this defrauding of the American public and
the deliberate evisceration of the
Constitution of the United States. It is
hiding Barack Obama's Fraud as it has been
revealed by a Sheriff in Arizona. The
silence of the American press would be
unbelievable if it weren't so blatantly
obvious.
It is nearly as egregious as the audacity of
Obama's fraud itself..." Full text:
Arizona sheriff finds Obama presidential
qualifications forged
Response to comment [from a Catholic]: [Americans, even rational conservatives acknowledge the president was born in Hawaii. Serpent replies: :yawn: bandwagon]
We know how you Lefties (Eccl
10:2) love
revisionist history.
Barbarian used a fallacious argument called
bandwagon (a statement is assumed to be
logically valid because of popular support).
...and "Jimmy likes Elaine."
"Revisionist" would be changing the story. That's what birthers do..."
Don't let facts get in the way.
"...[S]ince you're into revisionism..."
You're projecting
again.
You cited: Michael Medved, John Avlon, David
Horowitz, and Little Green Footballs. You
used a fallacious argument called
bandwagon (a statement is assumed to be
logically valid because of popular support).
You are
also known for summarizing your opponent's
argument incorrectly (e.g.
strawman). Try to make a case without use of
fallacies.
Eph 4:14
As a reminder,
you need a savior before you need an
American born citizen as your President.
Barbarian quote: "...I believe that the
death we are saved from is a spiritual one."
Serpentdove quote: "Do you believe in a
physical, literal, bodily resurrection of
Jesus?"
Barbarian quote: "I think you're wrong about
that."
link
Eph 5:11
See:
Satan Inc (TOL Heretics List )
Barbarian
Response to comment [from a Catholic]: "Just pointing out that even most conservatives think you have a screw loose."
Just using a fallacious argument called bandwagon.
Response to comment [from a Catholic]: [ Just using a fallacious argument called bandwagon.] "...It's not an argument. It's evidence."
You cited the opinion of others (Michael Medved, John Avlon, David Horowitz, and Little Green Footballs). Opinions are just that--opinions. Try to discuss facts. aCultureWarrior has provided interesting links, as well.
Response to comment [from a Christian]: "Are you ready to discuss the evidence yet Barbarian?"
It would seem that he doesn't even bother you read the links that you've provided.
I do, FYI.