New Page 0

Banned Again

Oh no! Now why were you banned?

Response to comment [from a Christian]:

aCultureWarrior wrote: "Unnecessarily disruptive" (in my own thread). I guess I was too hard on the drag queen. Twas a good time to be banned, as much as going on here. While I would normally work on the table of contents, that will have to wait. Dec. 22, @ 1 PM is the ban's expiration date and time."

That's not too long.

Will you start a part III soon?

aCultureWarrior wrote: Not long enough...

You're like me.

I'm glad you're not taking it seriously.

They aren't serious people.

aCultureWarrior wrote: Part 3? There is much more to cover, we'll see.

It's very popular. Couldn't hurt. Maybe when it gets to the same size as Pt I?

Ready for Christmas?

"The merchants get excited about babies this time of the year and the Christ child and the manger scenes. Why? Because the jingle bells to them are the bells of the cash register. Right now for your it's jingle bells. In a little while it will be juggle bills." ~ Adrain Rogers

aCultureWarrior wrote: Hardly, you're the brains of this outfit.

The brains that can't figure out how to survive on TOL.

When you see my face going back to normal, you know that I think I'll be banned soon.

When I'm this

or that

, I've said nothing controversial. I don't want to be stuck with a French or Chinese face for a month which

I cannot change during a ban.

Who knows what their rhyme or reason is there.

aCultureWarrior wrote: I take this culture war very seriously, hence being disruptive (in my own thread even).

"Sometimes we must comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable." ~ David Jeremiah

They're all talking about Duck Dynasty over there and the patriarch's comments.

"I hate you guys." ~ Eric Cartman Ps 26:5

aCultureWarrior wrote: "BTW: Who was the sodomite lover that reported me?"

Not sure. I'm sorry you don't have your own TV show.

Do you have a lot of character in your face? Maybe Knight can use your mug one day.

aCultureWarrior wrote: If or when I return to TOL, I'll use this passage frequently (it goes to TOL moderators as well). Galatians 1:10

You're not a man-pleaser.

aCultureWarrior wrote: Be prepared to get banned (they always get even) with this hilarious comment to TOL's owner and head moderator:
[SD] Think he could have rephrased? Would you have banned him for similar comments here? link

I usually don't respond to moderators because it's not safe to do so.

Jas 2:1-7

My brethren, have not the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory, with respect of persons [James 2:1].

"...What James is telling us here is not to profess faith in Christ and at the same time be a spiritual snob. Don’t join some little clique in the church. All believers are brethren in the body of Christ, whatever their denomination. There is a fellowship of believers; friendship should be over them as a banner. James is addressing the total community of believers—the rich, the poor, the common people, the high, the low, the bond and free, the Jew and the Gentile, the Greek and the barbarian, male and female. They are all one when they are in the body of Christ. There is a brotherhood within the body of believers, and the Lord Jesus Christ is the common denominator. Friendship and fellowship are the legal tender among believers.

James says, “Don’t hold your faith with respect of persons.” If you belong to the Lord Jesus Christ and another person belongs to the Lord Jesus Christ, he is your brother. Furthermore, if a sinner comes into your assembly or you otherwise come into contact with him, remember that he is a human being for whom Christ died. He stands at the foot of the cross, just as you stand at the foot of the cross.

The Old Testament taught Israel not to regard the person of the rich or of the poor. God, in the Mosaic system, cautioned: “Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment: thou shalt not respect the person of the poor, nor honour the person of the mighty: but in righteousness shalt thou judge thy neighbour” (Lev. 19:15). Simon Peter learned this lesson at Joppa when God let down from heaven the sheet full of unclean animals and commanded him to eat of them. Peter concluded from that experience, “… Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons” (Acts 10:34)..." McGee, J. V. (1991). Thru the Bible commentary: The Epistles (James) (electronic ed., Vol. 53, pp. 55–60). Nashville: Thomas Nelson.

aCultureWarrior wrote: Thanks for the informative post.

I'm here to study (2 Ti 2:15). :Poly:

One more day and you are due back, mister.

aculturewarrior wrote:I'm just not in the mood to go back to all of that TOL hate right now. Hold down the fort until I am.

No!

You're due back today.

Come on now.

Banned Again