[Defying order, clerk won't give gay couple marriage license by Claire Galofaro Morehead, KY AP] "A Kentucky clerk's office turned away a gay couple seeking a marriage license on Thursday, defying a federal judge's order that dismissed her argument involving religious freedom.
Rowan County Clerk Kim Davis' office turned away David Moore and David Ermold just hours after a U.S. district judge ordered her to do the opposite."
Deputy clerk Nathan Davis says the office was advised by its attorneys with the Christian law firm Liberty Counsel to continue refusing same-sex couples as it appeals the ruling to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals.
Kim Davis has argued that her deeply held Christian beliefs prevent her from issuing licenses to same-sex couples. After the U.S. Supreme Court ruled gay marriage bans unconstitutional, Davis stopped issuing licenses to any couple, gay or straight.
Five couples sued her, and U.S. District Judge David L. Bunning on Wednesday ordered her to comply with the Supreme Court's ruling.
He wrote that her refusal "likely violated the constitutional rights of her constituents."
Ermold, in a tearful plea, called her actions "cruel" and said they were representative of the continued discrimination faced by gay couples.
In Kentucky, county clerks issue marriage licenses, but someone else must "solemnize" the marriage before the license can be filed with the county clerk. Davis argued that issuing a same-sex marriage license that contains her signature is the same as her approving the marriage, which she said violates her Christian beliefs. But Bunning rejected that argument, saying Davis has likely violated the U.S. Constitution's ban on the government establishing a religion by "openly adopting a policy that promotes her own religious convictions at the expenses of others."
"Davis remains free to practice her Apostolic Christian beliefs. She may continue to attend church twice a week, participate in Bible Study and minister to female inmates at the Rowan County Jail. She is even free to believe that marriage is a union between one man and one woman, as many Americans do," Bunning wrote. "However, her religious convictions cannot excuse her from performing the duties that she took an oath to perform as Rowan County Clerk."
Laura Landenwich, an attorney for the plaintiffs, said the 28-page ruling reveals that the judge painstakingly combed through each of Davis' legal arguments and rejected each one. Bunning said that although couples could get marriage licenses elsewhere, "why should they be required to?" He noted the surrounding counties require 30 minutes or one hour of travel and there are many "in this rural region of the state who simply do not have the physical, financial or practical means to travel."
Bunning said state law does not allow the county judge-executive to issue marriage licenses unless Davis is absent from her job, and Bunning refused to deem Davis absent because she has a religious objection. And Bunning said issuing a marriage license does not constitute speech, saying the marriage license form "does not require the county clerk to condone or endorse same-sex marriage on religious or moral grounds." Defying order, clerk won't give gay couple marriage license
Response to comment [from other]: "Sounds like she needs a different job ... where she is actually willing to comply with her duties."
Apparently she's the only one left qualified for the job (Ac 5:29).
Response to comment [from an agnostic]: "She should be fired and the couple should be rewarded their license."
Is 5:20
Response to comment [from other]: "Apparently she's the only one left qualified for the job."
You removed the scripture from my quote (Eph 4:14).
Apparently she's the only one left qualified for the job (Ac 5:29).
Josh 24:15
"Then obviously they need more candidates..."
More godless candidates (Is 5:20).
Response to comment [from an agnostic]: [Is 5:20
]
"Your input to the discussion is well thought out and as impactful as
usual."
We
won't have to put up with you (Eccl
10:2,
Jn 10:10) much longer (2
Thess 4:17).
As a reminder, do take the mark of the beast (Rev. 13:16, 17; Rev. 14:9, 11; Rev. 20:4).
Response to comment [from other]: "I wonder ... if the same clerk refuses to marry divorced adulterers..."
You don't support her current moral stand (Gen. 2:1824) but you would support her stand on Lk 16:18?
Better adjust that moral compass of yours.
That serial adulterer will be by soon.
Response to comment [from an agnostic]: "Her managers must support her, otherwise they'd fire her for refusing to carry out the duties the taxpayers are paying her to do."
Would you have supported the tax payers of Sodom and Gomorrah, too?
Ge 13:13,
Ex 23:2Response to comment [from an agnostic]: "Discrimination isn't a moral stand."
Sure it is. I discriminate between good and bad smells.
I discriminate between good
and bad friends.
I discriminate between right and wrong.
You don't?
Is 5:20Response to comment [from other]: [You don't support her current moral stand (Gen. 2:1824) but you would support her stand on Lk 16:18?
]
"No, I do not."
Drunk up. Fornicate on (Re
22:11).Response to comment [from an agnostic]: "...[Y]ou can't discern the meaning of a word..."
2 Ti 1:7"Disingenuous, I thought so."
Keep
judging God. That will end well (Jas
4:11).
What
have you done to defend marriage (
