Galaxy Games by Andrew Rigg

This year stretched the imaginations of many astronomers and cosmologists. They have discovered amazing features at the outer reaches of the universe. And they cause headaches for those with blind faith in naturalistic origin theories—including a big bang about 14 billion years ago.

Back in January, a team of astronomers announced the discovery of a massive and distant string of galaxies. By their own dating methods, they were looking at a structure within only 2 billion years of the universe’s inception. This was much too early for such a complex structure to have evolved naturally.¹

Later this year, astronomers announced another anomalous discovery. This time, they found individual galaxies at allegedly advanced stages of galactic “evolution” in a part of the sky named the “redshift desert”.² They used the Gemini North Telescope, with an 8-metre mirror, on the summit of Mauna Kea on the big island of Hawaii.

This area of the sky is supposed to be so old and so close to the beginning of everything that it was believed nothing as complex as a galaxy should, or could, exist there.

Under big bang assumptions, astronomers looking into the redshift desert are seeing the universe as it was 8 to 11 billion years ago, at a time when it was “only” 3 to 6 billion years old. This part of the sky had not previously been widely explored. Astronomers believed it contained objects too faint and dim to study properly. However, recent advances in telescope optics have allowed astronomers to make a systematic study of the redshift desert, the Gemini Deep Deep Survey (GDDS).²

What the GDDS astronomers found was totally unexpected. Where they had expected to see young, small, still-developing galaxies, they found more than 300 fully mature galaxies, just like those seen near our own galaxy, the Milky Way.

Team member Dr Karl Glazebrook from Johns Hopkins University says the find presents a huge challenge because their “star-forming youth is in fact long gone.”² He explained:

“We expected to find basically zero massive galaxies beyond about 9 billion years ago, because theoretical models [based on the big bang] predict that massive galaxies form last. Instead we found highly developed galaxies that just shouldn’t have been there, but are.”³

This is a story that is sounding more and more familiar.

A creationist view

Thanks to new developments in Earth-based optical technology and orbiting telescopes such as the Hubble Space Telescope, astronomers have been able to detect fainter light from more distant objects. So they can probe the most distant reaches of space and detect objects so faint that astronomers 10 years ago did not even know they existed.

These new discoveries have shaken current theories of star and galaxy formation:

• Elements thought to “evolve” within the furnaces of ancient stars over many billions of years have been found “only” 2.5 billion years after the big bang, under their own dating system.⁴
• Very complex strings of galaxies, claimed to be hundreds of light-years in size, have been found at a time when only small, isolated proto-galaxies should exist.¹
• And now, massively complex galaxies and supermassive black holes (see box) have also been found too early in the evolutionary life of the universe to be explained by conventional theories.

So what is the creationist response to these latest, amazing discoveries?

In Genesis 1:14–19, God tells us when He created the heavenly bodies—the planets, stars and galaxies that make up our amazing universe. The passage teaches that God commanded, “Let there be lights”, and the command was fulfilled with rapid formation of these objects—“and it was so”—all within Day 4. This is further reinforced in Exodus 31:17, “for in six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, and on the seventh day he abstained from work and rested”. Also, Psalm 33:6 declares, “by the word of the Lord were the heavens made, the starry host by the breath of his mozuth.”

In the big bang model of the origin of the universe, galaxies started small. These small galaxies then began to collide. Eventually, after many billions of years, large, mature galaxies, like our own, were formed. This is called the hierarchical model of galaxy formation.

If the original heavenly bodies were created mature, then we would expect to see fully formed galaxies everywhere, even in the most distant parts of the universe. We should not be surprised to see massive strings of galaxies or to find supermassive black holes in all regions of space. In a nutshell, mature galactic structures are not a problem for creationist astronomers.

Australian physicist and creation cosmologist, Dr John Hartnett, says that these recent discoveries are very signi­ficant for a creationist understanding of the universe. “This has enormous significance because [the big bang astronomers] are saying they don’t see how such a structure could form so quickly according to the big bang model.”

 

Dr Hartnett believes that the redshift methods used to measure the distances to these objects are flawed.⁵ A growing list of evolutionary astronomers and cosmologists, such as Dr Halton Arp, agree that the big bang interpretations of the redshifts are flawed. Arp documented many pairs of objects that have greatly different redshifts, supposedly showing that they are vast distances apart and receding at hugely different speeds. Yet there is also connecting material between them, meaning that they must be the same distance away.⁶

If the distances are wrong, then an object may appear small and dim not because it is incredibly distant, but because it really is small and dim.⁷ And faulty distances mean that any theory based on them—such as the big bang—is faulty too!

As telescope technology continues to improve and astronomers are able to probe more easily the darkest depths of the universe, it is likely more and more of these big-bang–defying discoveries will arise.

These mature galaxies present a major problem for evolutionary scientists. But the underlying models have become so flexible that it is only a matter of time until they are modified to explain away such problems. However, for the biblical Christian, these discoveries, and others like them, are sound and exciting evidence in support of the biblical creation account. This account, unlike its evolutionary counterparts, is divinely inspired, so does not need any modification and change whenever new discoveries are made.