Learning the right tricks about life’s origin

[Learning the right tricks about life’s origin Answers in Genesis] "A Scientific American article admits (way back in 1991) that the “chicken and egg” problem of DNA and proteins has not been solved by the RNA hypothesis. DNA requires proteins to function, and proteins are made from DNA. :dizzy: The actual laboratory observations are highly artificial with a “great deal of help from the scientists.” Miller’s and Fox’s experiments on the origin of proteins and proteinoids, which supposedly produced “protocells,” are essentially dead ends. Clever attempts at producing life in the lab only demonstrate that life can be produced by intelligence. The stories of life originating in clay crystals and deep-ocean vents are just stories, with no observational data to confirm them. In all, much more research is needed to even begin to answer the question of the origin of life in a materialistic framework. Creationists need only accept that God has created life and study the changes that have occurred since the creation."  Evolution Exposed, Second Ed. Learning the right tricks about life’s origin, Learning the right tricks about life’s origin

Response to comment [from other]:  [Quote] "That's not science."

CheeseWiz' please quote accurately. This is from: John Horgan, ‘Trends in Evolution: In the Beginning…’, Scientific American, February 1991, p. 100-109.

"Even if all the data point to an intelligent designer, such as hypothesis is excluded from science because it is not naturalistic." Dr. Scott Todd, Kansas State University, Nature 401 (6752):423, Sept. 30, 1999.

Response to comment [from an atheist]:  "In other words, 'science is hard, so lets just believe in magic'."

If science is hard for the creationist, it is also hard for the naturalist.  What's your point? :idunno:

Same empirical evidence.  Different interpretations.

See:

War of Worldviews

What is a Biblical Worldview?

Can an Intellectual Believe in God?  

How to Know the Bible is the Word of God  

Evolution vs. Creation 

Beware lest anyone [5]cheat you through philosophy and empty deceit, according to ithe tradition of men, according to the [j]basic principles of the world, and not according to Christ
5 Lit. plunder you or take you captive.
i Gal. 1:14
j Gal. 4:3, 9, 10; Col. 2:20
The New King James Version. Nashville : Thomas Nelson, 1982, S. Col 2:8

"You believe God (revelation) or you believe man (speculation)." J. Vernon McGee

Response to comment [from an atheist]:  "But RNA has demonstrated self-catalytic activity (proteins) and can code information (DNA). That DNA need protein doesn't seem like a relevant objection."

In the Startling plant discovery presents problems for evolution, DeWitt thread, RNA is discussed: 

'In order for DNA to be transcribed, many proteins must interact with the DNA. The problem is that DNA is needed to make the proteins that are used to transcribe the DNA—a classic example of the “chicken and the egg” dilemma. Evolution cannot explain how such a system could have evolved by random processes acting over time. DNA was created fully functional."  Evolution Exposed, Second Ed.

Learning the right tricks about life’s origin