Mind Control by Ken Ham,
President/CEO, AiG–U.S.
As I lined up with hundreds of others to get inside London’s famed Natural
History Museum to visit its new Darwin exhibition (England is celebrating
Charles Darwin’s 200th birthday this year), I couldn’t help but wonder: was this
going to be some kind of attempt at mind control? After I went through the
exhibition, there was no doubt!
The Darwin exhibit reminded me of one of those bizarre science fiction movies
where people line up to be placed in a special machine and emerge like robots;
these people now can’t think for themselves, and they end up being like those
people who brainwashed them.
In a related way, I found the Darwin exhibit to be a very clever form of mind
control, basically consisting of:
1.Setting up straw-men arguments that totally misrepresent what Bible-believing
Christians accept.
2.Showing how wrong Christians are for believing the things they supposedly
believe (which they don’t believe in the first place!).
3.Convincing visitors that Darwinian evolution is true, and that one is a fool
to believe otherwise (and certainly foolish to believe the Bible).
Actually, this kind of mind control is already being used constantly on
America’s children through the public education system, the secular media, and
science museums (even in many Christian schools and colleges, sadly). Using
London’s Darwin exhibition, let’s look at how they are using mind control:
1.Visitors read this display:
Before Darwin was born most people in England accepted certain ideas about the
natural world as given. Species were not linked in a single family tree. They
were unconnected, unrelated and unchanged since the moment of their creation and
earth itself was thought to be so young, perhaps only 6000 years old, that there
would not have been time for species to change. . . . Before Darwin, it was
still possible to see the world as timeless, eternal and unchanging.
Wrong. That’s a straw man. People who know and believe their Bible are aware
that the earth has indeed changed because of what’s recorded in Genesis (the
entrance of sin, the event of Noah’s Flood, and its account of the Tower of
Babel). Those who believe God’s Word know that two of every “kind” (seven of
some) of land-dwelling animal were on Noah’s Ark. All the different species
(there can be thousands of species within one kind) of land animals that are
alive today descended from the “kinds” that got off the Ark. Yes, animals have
changed—and the earth has changed drastically since Adam sinned.
In fact, before Darwin came along, people were breeding different sorts of dogs,
cats, pigeons, and so on. Even in the Darwin exhibit, it is stated that “he
[Darwin] was aware that people often bred animals with desirable traits and that
over time such breeding exaggerated small differences. . . . Dogs were dogs but
a tiny lap dog and a large lean greyhound look nothing alike.” I just wonder how
many visitors noticed this gross inconsistency.
Of course, everyone knows that animals change. The exhibition’s straw-man
argument—that Bible-believers think that animals within a species can’t
change—is set up so that the trustworthiness of the Bible can easily be knocked
down.
2.Now that the museum visitors are beginning to have their minds controlled to
think that Bible-believers don’t accept that things have changed, the
exhibition’s mind controllers state:
Discoveries in geology had already challenged the idea that the world and all
its species had been created at the same time a few thousand years ago. Fossils
clearly show that in past ages the world had been inhabited by different species
than those existing today . . .
So, Bible-believers supposedly don’t believe animals change, but Darwin figured
out that they do, proving the Bible wrong. These changes were his evidence of
evolution (e.g., ape-like creatures turning to people).
This, too, is designed to make London’s museum visitors think that they have to
reject the Bible’s account of origins and a young earth.
3.Now, here was the final step in indoctrinating visitors to disbelieve the
Bible through mind control. They are indoctrinated to believe in an additional
straw-man: creationists don’t accept that new species can form. But we do. We
have stated innumerable times that speciation occurs—and that natural selection
happens (as we show in a new exhibit at the Creation Museum). But we declare
that speciation cannot result in Darwinian evolution— the idea that one totally
different kind of creature (not species) changes into a totally different kind
(e.g., the reptile kind becoming the bird kind). The London exhibit says:
Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection is the only scientific
explanation for the spectacular diversity of life on earth. It provides a
powerful framework for understanding nature and is one of the essential theories
of the very core of science. . . . As Darwin himself anticipated some people
have held to the conviction that species are the result of special creation
through the action of a Creator. Some find incompatible with their religious
beliefs the concept that humans share a common ancestry with earlier primates
and that humans and other species evolved over immense spans of time.
Creationism, including Intelligent Design, does not offer a scientific
alternative to the theory of evolution by invoking the act of a Creator or an
Intelligent Designer as the explanation for large diversity.
Sad, isn’t it?
The Bible warns us about such mind controllers at the Darwin exhibition: it is
they “who suppress the truth in unrighteousness” (Romans 1:18). Now I ask: to
what extent have the mind controllers of this age influenced you and your
family, and not just with the creation/ evolution question? Think about it. Then
make sure you keep supplying yourself with answers to defend our Christian
faith!
http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/au/mind-control