Politics as Usual
[From Politico] "W.H. hopes you miss...a
suggestion from President Obama’s critics that his decision to name
James Cole deputy attorney general in a recess appointment is a step in
the direction away from working with Republicans.
Jennifer Rubin writes at The Washington Post: “On Wednesday, Obama shed
any pretense of bipartisanship in making six recess appointments. As
were his previous recess appointments, this batch included two
individuals whose records are so controversial that they could not
obtain confirmation even with 59 Democratic senators. ...
“The most egregious appointment is undoubtedly James Cole, installed as
the deputy attorney general. There were good reasons why he could not
secure Senate confirmation. The Web site Main Justice explained that
Sen. Jeff Sessions (R.-Ala.), the ranking Republican on the Senate
Judiciary Committee, has strenuously objected to Cole's controversial
stance on the War on Terror, which Cole expressed in a 2002 op-ed. ...
“Debra Burlingame, co-founder of Keep America Safe and the sister of a
pilot slaughtered on 9-11, tells me via email, ‘Cole filed a brief on
behalf of Prince Naif in which he derided the basis of the families'
lawsuit as pure fantasy. One hopes that was Cole, the advocate, rather
than representative of his personal point of view.’ She bluntly observes
that ‘his remarks, less than one year after 9/11, comparing Wahabbi-inspired
terrorism to the drug trade or lone nut McVeigh are, to me,
disqualifying. He's dreadful.’ ”
Story
What are your thoughts on the Cole appointment? Should terrorists be
tried as criminals or terrorists?
Holder's still trying to figure out how to try Khalid Sheikh Mohammad.
Do you believe in a world court (international law) or the U.S.
Constitution?