Vatican II
"Will we honor the Lord Jesus or praise the pope
who denied the sufficiency of Christ and rejected His finished work of
redemption?"
See:
Pope John Paul's Disputed Influence on Christianity
Response to comment [from other]: [Latin mass]
Do you think it is wise to have a service in Latin
when 99% of the people attending cannot understand the word of God being
spoken? What is a church member seeking the Lord supposed to
glean?
"My mother is a devout Catholic but she has a major issue with Vatican
II (I think it was Vatican II). They got rid of meatless Fridays. So
growing up I was not allowed any meat on Fridays."
Count Dracula (atheist) here is a product of
Catholic teaching--not an uncommon experience. "Ye shall know them
by their fruits (Mt 7:16)."
"Want to explain how your logic could
possibly follow? Or are you just trolling?"
The natural result of a work-based faith is
lukewarmness (Re 3:14-22). The product, God spits out (Rev
3:15-16). When you are the product of a Bible believing church
(e.g. Philadelphia [Re 3:7-13]), your fruits are knowledge of the word
of God. J. Vernon McGee wrote on this topic:
"With the other churches, when the
Lord Jesus said, “I know thy works,” He meant good works; He was commending
them for good works. But the Lord Jesus has no word of commendation for this
church. All is condemnation here. Even the “works” here are not good works;
they are evil works.
“That thou art neither cold nor
hot: I would thou wert cold or hot.” This had a background and a local
meaning for the people in that day. Being down in the valley, they had
difficulty getting water in Laodicea. As I stood there in the ruins, I
looked south toward the Phrygian mountains, some of which are very high. I
was there around the first of June, and there was still an abundance of snow
on top of those mountains. The Laodiceans built an aqueduct to bring that
cold water down from the mountains. When it left the mountains, it was ice
cold, but by the time it made that trip all the way down the mountains to
Laodicea, it was lukewarm. And lukewarm water is not very good.
Down in the valley where the Lycus
River joins the Maeander River, there are hot springs. The springs are so
hot that steam is produced. The Turkish government has capped it and is
using it today, and I understand they intend to develop its use even more
because it is there in abundance. It is the hottest water you can imagine; a
lot of it is just steam. However, when they would take this hot water up to
Laodicea, by the time it got there, it was no longer hot—it had become
lukewarm water.
When the Lord Jesus said to the
Laodicean church, “You are neither cold nor hot,” they knew exactly what He
was talking about. They had been drinking lukewarm water for years. Water
left the mountains ice cold, and it left the springs steaming hot, but when
they got it, both were lukewarm, and it was sickening. We like to put a
little ice in our water, and many folk drink hot water, but lukewarm water
is just not good, my friend. The Lord Jesus said that this church was
neither cold nor hot and He would spew it out of His mouth.
A cold
church actually means a church that has denied every cardinal doctrine of
the faith. It is given over to formality and is carrying on in active
opposition to the Word of God and the gospel of Christ. You find today in
liberalism that they are in active opposition to the gospel of Jesus Christ.
Hot speaks of
those with real spiritual fervor and passion like the Christians in Ephesus,
although they were even then getting away from their best love. Oh, the
Spirit of God had brought them to a high pitch in their personal
relationship to Christ!
But the Laodicean church was
neither hot nor cold—just lukewarm. Between those positions of hot and cold,
you have this lukewarm state. I would say that this is a picture of many,
many churches today in the great denominations that have departed from the
faith. Many churches—both in and out of these denominations—attempt to
maintain a middle-of-the-road position. They do not want to come out
flatfootedly for the Word of God and for the great doctrines of the
Christian faith. And at the same time, they do not want to be known as a
liberal church. So they play footsie with both groups. I have broken
fellowship with quite a few men who are extremists in both directions, some
extreme fundamentalists and some extreme liberals. And many of these men
attempt to play both sides of the street. That is a condition that is
impossible. This is the thing that makes the Lord Jesus sick. He very
frankly says that He will spew them out of His mouth.
To my judgment this
middle-of-the-road position is the worst kind of hypocrisy there is. “Thou
hast a name that thou livest, and art dead” (v. 1). “Having a form of
godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away” (2 Tim. 3:5).
In its beginning Protestantism
assumed the position of believing all the great doctrines of the Christian
faith. The creeds of all the great historic denominations are wonderful
creeds. The Westminster Confession of Faith is unparalleled in my
estimation, but it is now largely repudiated by the church that owned it for
years. The Heidelberg Catechism is a marvelous confession, but who is
following it? Who believes these wonderful creeds in our day? The churches
have a form of godliness but are denying the power thereof. They have a name
that they live, but they are dead. They are neither hot nor cold—they are
lukewarm.
This is the condition of the church
today, and unfortunately, it is the condition of a great many so-called
fundamental, conservative churches. Thank God that there are many who do not
come under this classification. But the thing that is absolutely startling
and frightening and fearful is that He says, “I will spue thee out of my
mouth.” In other words, “I will vomit
you out of my mouth.” Does that sound to you like the church which He’s
going to rapture, to whom He says, “I go to prepare a place for you. And if
I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again, and receive you unto
myself; that where I am, there ye may be also” (John 14:2–3)? I don’t think
so. That is the church He draws to Himself, but here is a church He just
vomits out because it is lukewarm. Lukewarm water makes you sick at your
stomach. I am of the opinion that if He spoke to a lot of churches today, He
would say, “You make Me sick at My stomach. You’re
professed Christians. You
say you love Me. You say
it, but you don’t mean it.”
This is a heart-searching message
for this hour because we are living in the time of the Laodicean church and
of the Philadelphian church. Both of them are side by side, and there is a
great bifurcation in Christianity today. It is not in denominations, and it
is not Romanism and Protestantism. The great bifurcation consists of those
who believe the Word of God and follow it, love it, obey it, and those who
reject it. That is the line of division today."
McGee, J.
Vernon: Thru the Bible Commentary. electronic ed. Nashville :
Thomas Nelson, 1997, c1981, S. 5:921-923[Latin mass]
Why would primarily English speaking
perishes wish to return to Latin today?
"Using one person as proof of the
collective "fruit" of the entire Catholic Church is ridiculous..."
It would be ridiculous to argue that all Roman
Catholics become atheists--which is why I do not make that claim.
What I do argue is that it is not uncommon for Catholics (or
Protestants) to live ungodly lives. What I do argue is that
work-based faiths lead to dead ritual and dead spirituality.
Ritual will not lead one to the Lord. Religion keeps one from
the Lord.
[Ritual will not lead one to the Lord.]
"It has led many to the Lord. If you do not understand this, you are
estranged from the very human nature God gave you to apprehend Who
He is.
Then why does Jesus rebuke those who practice
dead ritual: "And when you pray, you shall not be like the
hypocrites. For they love to pray standing in the synagogues and
on the corners of the streets, that they may be seen by men.
Assuredly, I say to you, they have their reward (Mt 6:5)."
...and vain repetition (e.g. the rosary):
"And when you pray, do not use vain repetitions as the heathen do.
For they think that they will be heard for their many words (Mt
6:7)."
It is the difference between religion and
relationship. Prayer beads are more similar to Muslim prayer
beads than historical, biblical Christianity.
"...Because dead ritual, like faith without works, does not save."
Works are a manifestation of faith. If a
man works (a prescription given by churches none of which are
biblical) but has no faith (trusts in a church or program not God
alone), his works are meaningless. God calls this work in the
flesh filthy rags (Isa 64:6).
"Your modern version is grounded in no more than your wish to make
Christianity more accommodating to you."
Believers from the beginning of creation had a
personal relationship with the Lord. Men descends to dead
ritualism.
Vatican II