Waters Schmaters

 

[China confronts Indian navy vessel By Ben Bland] "A Chinese warship confronted an Indian navy vessel shortly after it left a Vietnamese port in late July in the first such encounter between the two countries’ navies in the South China Sea.

The unidentified Chinese warship demanded that India’s INS Airavat, an amphibious assault vessel, identify itself and explain its presence in what it said were Chinese waters, shortly after it completed a scheduled port call in Vietnam..."
China confronts Indian navy vessel

Related:

[Is China Planning a Surprise Missile Attack by Gordon G. Chang] "A retired Chinese general recently revealed that his country might be planning a surprise missile attack on the United States. The public comment of Xu Guangyu came in response to WikiLeaks revelations that last year Washington had warned its allies beforehand of China’s test of a missile interceptor..."
Is China Planning a Surprise Missile Attack?

 

Response to comment [from a Christian]: "The Chinese may be kinda short but they are not drooling idiots."

 

[Is U.S. Strength Provocative to China, or U.S. Weakness? By John R. Bolton] "...China's Communist Party, still dominated by the Peoples' Liberation Army ("PLA"), will continue to restrict political and religious freedom and reassert control not only over the economy's "commanding heights," but also over sectors now relatively free. An authoritarian power structure could accelerate the existing military buildup, both nuclear and conventional, combining a rapidly growing force-projection capability with increasingly belligerent political and territorial claims in the nearby seas -- particularly against Taiwan -- and greater assertiveness across land borders against weaker neighbors (eschewing confrontation with Russia and India for now). This "rising China" would not be Maoist in the old revolutionary sense, but a "machtpolitik" troublemaker.

An infinite number of scenarios exist between these corner alternatives, and it undoubtedly behooves America to press China in the "peaceful rise" direction. But here is the dilemma: is U.S. strength provocative to China, or U.S. weakness? Friedberg makes clear that weakness is provocative , and that what separates Beijing and Washington is not lack of communication or cooperation, but "the underlying divergence of interests" that inevitably shapes world political competition..."
Is U.S. Strength Provocative to China, or U.S. Weakness? By John R. Bolton

 

"All they have right now is a crazy huge infantry..."

 

Could you make those Chinese finger traps?

"The Pentagon is considering a range of options to meet a bipartisan call to greatly reduce defense spending in what is a “perfect storm” rocking the military’s once-sturdy budget plans.

The Army is looking at paring down combat brigades and ending some targeting and communications systems. The Navy might delay ship construction and shed sailors.

Also, the purchase of the most expensive weapon system ever, the $380 billion F-35 joint strike fighter, could be pared from a planned 2,443 stealth jets..." Full text:
Pentagon ponders budget cuts in face of ‘perfect storm’: May reduce personnel and delay new jets, ships, tanks

 

"...[W]ake me up in about 15-20 years."

 

Ok. I'll send you a reminder.

"That July 2009 cable, posted on the WikiLeaks Web site on Friday, is one of hundreds from the American Embassy in Beijing that offer a glimpse into the depths, and heights, of relations between the United States and Chinese governments. The cables, involving secret but not very diplomatically delicate correspondence between the two powers, cover topics ranging from China’s claims on the South China Sea to the daily exercise regimen that the Chongqing Communist Party secretary, Bo Xilai, designed for himself..." Full text:
Leaked Cables Offer Glimpses Into Relations of U.S. and China

 

Waters Schmaters