Response to comment [from a Christian]: [Do White Christians Need A Real Nationalist Party?]

How much melanin must one have to be of value to you? Ge 1:27, Ac 17:26

See:

Melanin—Umbrellas of Our Skin

Are There Really Different Races?

One Race One Blood

"All humans are of value. When did I ever say otherwise? Secondly, race is not just the color of the skin."

Then why do you ask for a party based on skin color?  Ac 17:26. 

"...What is your interpretation of Gen 9:24-27"

And he said, Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren [Gen. 9:25].

I would have you note that God said, “Cursed be Canaan”—He does not put a curse on Ham. A question that keeps arising is this: Is the curse of Ham upon the dark races? It certainly is not. To think otherwise is absolutely absurd. The Scripture does not teach it. The coloration of the skin, the pigment that is in the epidermis of the human family, is there because of sunlight from the outside not because of sin from within. There is no curse placed upon Ham; the curse was upon Canaan his son. We do not know in what way Canaan was involved in this incident. We are given only the bare record here, but we recognize that Canaan is mentioned for a very definite purpose. Let me repeat that it hasn’t anything to do with color—it is not a curse of color put on a part of the human race. That teaching has been one of the sad things said about the black man. It is not fair to the black man and it is not fair to God—because He didn’t say it. After all, the first two great civilizations were Hamitic—both the Babylonian and Egyptian civilizations were Hamitic.
Another question arises: Why did God give us a record of the sin of Noah? Well, if man had written the Book of Genesis, he would have done one of two things. He either would have covered up the sin of Noah by not mentioning it at all to make Noah a hero; or else he would have made Noah’s sin a great deal more sordid than it was. But God recorded it for His own purposes.
First of all, as I have indicated, it was to encourage the children of Israel in entering the land of Canaan during the time of Moses. It let them know that God had pronounced a curse upon Canaan. He had pronounced His judgment upon the race. All you have to do is read the rest of the Old Testament and secular history to discover the fulfillment of this judgment. The Canaanites have pretty much disappeared.
God had a further reason for recording the incident of Noah’s sin. In Romans 15:4 we read these words: “For whatsoever things were written aforetime were written for our learning, that we through patience and comfort of the scriptures might have hope.” It was recorded to let you and me know something of the weakness of the flesh. The Lord Jesus said that the spirit is willing but the flesh is weak. And in Galatians 2:16 it is made very clear that no flesh would be justified by keeping the law: “… for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.” So God has given us here the story of a man who fell, revealing the weakness of the flesh.
There is no use trying to make excuses for Noah. The bare fact is that Noah got drunk.
Now, maybe you as a Christian do not get drunk. But, may I say, you and I may be living in the flesh to the extent we’re just as displeasing to God as Noah was. We have, I think, a wrong conception of life in this universe that we are in. For instance, our nation has spent billions of dollars to put men on the moon, and it looks like it’s not a good place to live anyway. But we spend relatively little on how to live on this earth. But God is concerned about training you and me how to live on this earth.
Let us not make some of the mistakes that are made in the consideration of this incident. We need to make it very clear that Noah did not lose his salvation. I trust that you understand that. It was an awful thing that he did—there is no excuse for it. It was his weakness of the flesh, but he was still a saved man.


McGee, J. V. (1991). Vol. 1: Thru the Bible commentary: The Law (Genesis 1-15) (electronic ed.) (152–153). Nashville: Thomas Nelson.

"If you have a black Father, or really anyone of the male line descending from Ham as your Father you are black. If so, you are morally obligated according to Gen 11-Acts 17:26 to generally-dominately [sic] preserve your tribe's racial and linguistic and cultural identity..."

Response to comment [from other]: [Dirty Yaks]

Ge 16:12, Ac 17:26, Ga 3:28, Col 3:11, 2 Cor 5:17

Response to comment [from a Catholic]: "Serpent hisses...no kidding..."

You're projecting again. We are one race--the human race.

See:

Barbarian

[Pic white guys]

What do you have against white guys?

Response to comment [from a Christian]: "Your author is conflating genus and species. I admit that whites, blacks and browns, and yellows and reds etc. are of the same genus. However, they are different in species."

Man was created by God (Gen. 1:26, 27), in His image (Gen. 9:6), for his pleasure and glory (Is. 43:7; Rev. 4:11). Man was made upright (Eccl. 7:29). He is superior to the animals (Matt. 10:31).

See:

Fixity of Species: A lesson in changing definitions

Man

"...[W]hen did I say that the curse was the color of their skin? I have gotten this a couple times now! You people are so desperate to demonize me that you are making complete fools of yourself."

You said: "I am trying to organize The Protestant White Nationalist Party.." link

Why are you calling for a political party based on skin pigmentation?

See:

It’s Not Just Black & White: Babel Explains Different People Groups

...crickets