Do White Christians Need A Real Nationalist Party?
Response to comment [from a Christian]: [Do White Christians Need A Real Nationalist Party?]
How much melanin
must one have to
be of value to
you?
Ge 1:27,
Ac 17:26
See:
Melanin—Umbrellas
of Our Skin
Are There Really
Different Races?
One Race One
Blood
"All humans are of value. When did I ever say otherwise? Secondly, race is not just the color of the skin."
Then why do you ask for a party based on skin color? Ac 17:26.
"...What is your interpretation of Gen 9:24-27"
And he said,
Cursed be
Canaan; a
servant of
servants shall
he be unto his
brethren [Gen.
9:25].
I would have you
note that God
said, “Cursed be
Canaan”—He does
not put a curse
on Ham. A
question that
keeps arising is
this: Is the
curse of Ham
upon the dark
races? It
certainly is
not. To think
otherwise is
absolutely
absurd. The
Scripture does
not teach it.
The coloration
of the skin, the
pigment that is
in the epidermis
of the human
family, is there
because of
sunlight from
the outside not
because of sin
from within.
There is no
curse placed
upon Ham; the
curse was upon
Canaan his son.
We do not know
in what way
Canaan was
involved in this
incident. We are
given only the
bare record
here, but we
recognize that
Canaan is
mentioned for a
very definite
purpose. Let me
repeat that it
hasn’t anything
to do with
color—it is not
a curse of color
put on a part of
the human race.
That teaching
has been one of
the sad things
said about the
black man. It is
not fair to the
black man and it
is not fair to
God—because He
didn’t say it.
After all, the
first two great
civilizations
were Hamitic—both
the Babylonian
and Egyptian
civilizations
were Hamitic.
Another question
arises: Why did
God give us a
record of the
sin of Noah?
Well, if man had
written the Book
of Genesis, he
would have done
one of two
things. He
either would
have covered up
the sin of Noah
by not
mentioning it at
all to make Noah
a hero; or else
he would have
made Noah’s sin
a great deal
more sordid than
it was. But God
recorded it for
His own
purposes.
First of all, as
I have
indicated, it
was to encourage
the children of
Israel in
entering the
land of Canaan
during the time
of Moses. It let
them know that
God had
pronounced a
curse upon
Canaan. He had
pronounced His
judgment upon
the race. All
you have to do
is read the rest
of the Old
Testament and
secular history
to discover the
fulfillment of
this judgment.
The Canaanites
have pretty much
disappeared.
God had a
further reason
for recording
the incident of
Noah’s sin. In
Romans 15:4 we
read these
words: “For
whatsoever
things were
written
aforetime were
written for our
learning, that
we through
patience and
comfort of the
scriptures might
have hope.” It
was recorded to
let you and me
know something
of the weakness
of the flesh.
The Lord Jesus
said that the
spirit is
willing but the
flesh is weak.
And in Galatians
2:16 it is made
very clear that
no flesh would
be justified by
keeping the law:
“… for by the
works of the law
shall no flesh
be justified.”
So God has given
us here the
story of a man
who fell,
revealing the
weakness of the
flesh.
There is no use
trying to make
excuses for
Noah. The bare
fact is that
Noah got drunk.
Now, maybe you
as a Christian
do not get
drunk. But, may
I say, you and I
may be living in
the flesh to the
extent we’re
just as
displeasing to
God as Noah was.
We have, I
think, a wrong
conception of
life in this
universe that we
are in. For
instance, our
nation has spent
billions of
dollars to put
men on the moon,
and it looks
like it’s not a
good place to
live anyway. But
we spend
relatively
little on how to
live on this
earth. But God
is concerned
about training
you and me how
to live on this
earth.
Let us not make
some of the
mistakes that
are made in the
consideration of
this incident.
We need to make
it very clear
that Noah did
not lose his
salvation. I
trust that you
understand that.
It was an awful
thing that he
did—there is no
excuse for it.
It was his
weakness of the
flesh, but he
was still a
saved man.
McGee, J. V.
(1991). Vol. 1:
Thru the Bible
commentary: The
Law (Genesis
1-15)
(electronic ed.)
(152–153).
Nashville:
Thomas Nelson.
"If you have a black Father, or really anyone of the male line descending from Ham as your Father you are black. If so, you are morally obligated according to Gen 11-Acts 17:26 to generally-dominately [sic] preserve your tribe's racial and linguistic and cultural identity..."
Response to comment [from other]: [Dirty Yaks]
Ge 16:12, Ac 17:26, Ga 3:28, Col 3:11, 2 Cor 5:17
Response to comment [from a Catholic]: "Serpent hisses...no kidding..."
You're projecting again. We are one race--the human race.
See:
Barbarian
[Pic white guys]
What do you have against white guys?
Response to comment [from a Christian]: "Your author is conflating genus and species. I admit that whites, blacks and browns, and yellows and reds etc. are of the same genus. However, they are different in species."
Man was created
by God (Gen.
1:26,
27),
in His image (Gen.
9:6),
for his pleasure
and glory (Is.
43:7;
Rev. 4:11).
Man was made
upright (Eccl.
7:29).
He is superior
to the animals (Matt.
10:31).
See:
Fixity of
Species: A
lesson in
changing
definitions
Man
"...[W]hen did I say that the curse was the color of their skin? I have gotten this a couple times now! You people are so desperate to demonize me that you are making complete fools of yourself."
You said: "I am
trying to
organize The
Protestant White
Nationalist
Party.."
link
Why are you
calling for a
political party
based on skin
pigmentation?
See:
It’s Not Just
Black & White:
Babel Explains
Different People
Groups
...crickets