"[Tyranny and genocide]]...([T]hings that you have EXPLICITLY supported)"

Proof please.

Response to comment [from an atheist]:  "I don't see one as being any better or really that much different than the other."

God does (Deut 22:5, Mt 19:4, Gen. 2:18–24).

Can you think at all with out referring to the Bible?

The scriptures are authoritative (1 Pet. 4:11) and true (Ps. 119:160).

Response to comment [from other]:  "In the "Rules of Engagement" thread, you defended genocide against non-[C]hristians. That disqualifies anything you have to say, ever."

I stated that soldiers kill the enemy in war.  You call this genocide? Eccl 3:8.

Did you mean to suggest that the enemy had desired to live peacefully with his neighbor and we killed him anyway?

"You said it was perfectly fine to deliberately murder civvies, even kids.  You said that it was morally right to kill non-Christian kids, since if they're murdered they go to Heaven and if they die after the age of accountability they go to Hell."

Proof please.

Response to comment [from other]:  [Signature] "...[F]ailed to provide any for her own poxy sig."

This is a statement of what I believe to be true based on our discussions.  Read the arguments and see if you recognize similarities.  Accept or reject my claim. 

"The only similarity between PB and gamera is that they're both left wingers."

Have you debated these people much? 

"Their posting styles are completely different."

Too bad you do not recognize similarities.  You may want to re-read taking a look at time stamps, too.  

Response to comment [from other]:  "Where is your proof in regards to your signature?"

I could tell you but then I'd have to kill you--and your entire village. Kill zem. Kill zem all.

Response to comment [from a Christian]:  "...another fantastic link to file under "How to shut up an atheist"."

Yet they never shut up? They go on and on about how evil this God is--who doesn't exist.

Response to comment [from other]:  [Link] "Here's ya proof SD. Right outta your own 'mouth'..." 

[Children who die before the age of accountability go to heaven (Luke 12:47, 48, Rom. 2:12–16, 1 Cor. 8:1–13). You believe it's better to grow up, learn to hate God (not unlike yourself [Jude 18]) and go to hell?]  Proof of what?

"You're contemptible."

Don't be like that bunny.

Response to comment [from other]:  "PB is anti-abortion and Gamera is pro-abortion."

You may want to take a look at the link again.

Response to comment [from other]:  "You said it was better to kill them before they become accountable."

Proof please.

Response to comment [from other]:  "She said it was good to kill Afghan kids...[02 Jan 2011 15:15:43]"

Proof please.

"You said, and I quote textually:  'Exterminating the enemy is a good thing (1 Sam 15:3).'..."

As the Marines say:  A dead enemy is a peaceful enemy (Mt 5:9).  

"You were then chewed on..."

You disagree?  How many would you let live?

"...It was pointed out that civvies aren't "the enemy".  Indeed, the deliberate murder of civilians is a WAR CRIME..."

Do you believe our soldiers deliberately murder civilians?  Do you believe that the average American soldier is a war criminal? 

"...and can easily be construed as a CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY."

Do you think America is responsible for "crimes against humanity"?

You don't kidnap Americans and make them confess on video in front of an Islamic flag do you?

Back to Marine bumper stickers: War never solved anything except slavery, oppression, genocide, communism, fascism.

"You did say that mass murdering children was the moral thing to do..."

I prefer that children live (Jn 10:10), share their toys (Mt 7:12), and make nice with their neighbors (Jn 16:2).  Are the little darlings doing this?  Mt 7:16-20. 

"I rest my case."

Well done.

'Allahu Akbar'.

Response to comment [from other]:  "You don't prefer that children live...You justify their deaths..."

1 Pet. 3:16.

"...[T]he most vile argument about how it would be better to die before reaching the "age of accountability"."

Too bad you do not have a proper fear of the Lord (Ge 31:53, Ro 1:28).

"There's not much you can do when your own words betray you."

Which words do you disagree with?

[Do you think America is responsible for "crimes against humanity"?]   "Yes.  All governments are evil. The American government is no different "

Our founding documents were based on the Bible.

How do you differ from Thomas Jefferson?

[From Glenn Beck Program 21Dec10: Restoring the Constitution] "BARTON: Thomas Jefferson, in his first inaugural address, he went through the presidency and said, the purpose of federal government is five- fold things. And in his inaugural address, he listed the five things that the government was supposed to do.

He said, number one, is to acknowledge and adore God. It's interesting -- Jefferson said that but they all believe if you don't start with the acknowledgement of God, you don't understand inalienable rights.

Second thing is for the government to exercise frugality -- frugality in spending and power and authority. Be a frugal government.

He said, third, is to restrain the infliction of injury. Government exists to keep bad guys under control. It's not to regulate the good guys. It's to keep bad guys from hurting somebody.

He said, the fourth thing the government is supposed to do is to encourage entrepreneurship and free enterprise, is to be business friendly and -- because that's where the prosperity comes from, that's where jobs come from.

He said, the fifth thing government should do is to protect property and the earnings of citizens. They consider the money you earn is your property and they couldn't take your money away any more than they could take your house or your property or anything else away.

And he said that's the five-fold purpose of government. Government exists for those five reasons. We've shifted so much away from what they envision, which was a small, limited government with five primary responsibilities where we the people were in charge of all three branches. That's what they wanted for America.

And if we read and study the Constitution and get back to that plan, that's what caused America to be the most prosperous, stable nation in history of the world..." Full text: Glenn Beck Program 21Dec10: Restoring the Constitution

"Origin of government: The development of organized systems of human government is described in Genesis, with man responsible not only for his own actions, but also for the maintenance of orderly social structures through systems of laws and punishments." Morris, Henry M.: The Genesis Record : A Scientific and Devotional Commentary on the Book of Beginnings. Grand Rapids, MI : Baker Books, 1976, S. 20

Response to comment [from other]  "Jefferson established a government."

I believe that was the point.

Response to comment [from a Christian]:  "I think its a load of hogwash..."

I don't.

"It's probably pretty simple for Knight to have a look to see whether they're the same people."

Ok.  I hope I'm wrong--although they'd still have to explain why their arguments are the same as the god-haters when they claim to be Christians (Re 22:11).

"How about you investigate whether or not your sig is true or false and that way people won't make assumptions about TOLers based on your unsubstantiated "beliefs." If having similar opinions or discussion is an indication that two people are actually the same person, there are a whole lot of folks using multiple user-IDs at TOL."

Have you debated these people?

[Have you debated these people?] Have you?

Dooku.

"I don't think you've discussed much with me..."

Is your memory fading Count?   Sin will do that (Jas 1:15). 

"So why do you think I'm Count Iblis?"

In 2008 you were two peas in a pod.

"I have never seen you present any evidence of your claims."

This is my belief. Dooksie, have you changed any of your views?

Response to comment [from other]:  "...[T]he one that conveniently links to your own website..."

CheeseWiz is slacking. Isn't it about time to report me again?

How's that case going? I'm only here to promote my own website--visited by four people.

"...[T]he one that conveniently links to your own website..."

Their own words won't do?

"PB is anti abortion whereas Gamera was more pro choice..."

That ol' chestnut.

"You are one vile little troll and a hypocrite."

Bunny, don't be like that.

"Dooku? Shame there isn't a Count(ess) Doofus on here as that would be your alternate account..."

You've found me out. In reality, I'm a humanoid, blood-sucking worm.

"You've squirmed away from the whole 'age of accountability' I notice..."

What don't you like?

Response to comment [from a Christian]:  "Oh baloney...'hope you're wrong'"

You think I'd like:  KMO, PB, Gamera, Taikoo to go to hell? 2 Cor 5:11.

Response to comment [from a Christian]:  [That ol' chestnut.] "Does that mean you aspire to be an open fire?"

Townso, you've been here for a while. What do you think of people who claim they are: a Satanist, former Jew, former Catholic on the right; or, a leftwing, pro-life, conservative; or, a rightwing, pro-abort, liberal?

Before believe their ever so accurate descriptions of themselves, why don't we ask them a few questions?

"You're no bunny til some bunny loves you."

I'm loved by all the right people (2 Thess. 2:16). He never should have divulged this information.

Sidebar for you and for TOLers who may be students: "Bill Watterson, the cartoonist who created the strip Calvin and Hobbes, decided in 1995 to end the strip after ten years of drawing the rambunctious 6-year-old and his loveable tiger. He knew the strip would end in December, and had months to conceive what would become the final comic. The attached cartoon is how he concluded one of the most successful comic strips of all time.

The “tabula rasa” mentality of Hobbes and the adventurous spirit of Calvin are a wonderful juxtaposition of two great attitudes with which to approach the new semester. From the rational, clear-thinking Hobbes, we get the idea that a new semester is a just that, new. The Fall Semester is gone and in the books. Rather than dwell on the past, regale in the past, or reminisce about the past, the clean slate approach reminds us that we get to start anew- the paper is clean and pencils are sharpened. Draw a masterpiece this semester! There are not many chances in life after schooling in which we have the opportunity to get a totally clean start—“do overs” just aren’t commonplace. My encouragement for students, parents and teachers alike is take advantage of it (Robert Scherrei, Dean of Academics, Valor High School)."

Response to comment [from a "Christian"]:  "Evidence?"

Posts as Count Iblis. http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/search.php?searchid=700578 Let the reader decide. Incidentally, how do you differ?

"It says you joined in 2009 so you wouldn't know what we were doing in 2008 anyway."

You're right. In 2008 I was elsewhere. It seems I joined TOL in the summer of 2009 after being banned from: Think Atheist , Atheist Nexus , Atheist QOTD , etc.

You can see why I don't care for this banning craze.
 

"Were you on TOL as another user before you joined as SD?"

A few housekeeping items:

I first used VanAnne but then changed to SerpentDove (a debate subsite of VanAnne.com to be more specific, Bob...). Apparently, our debates weren't too memorable.

Nevertheless, fun history.

"I'd prefer you don't broadcast lies in your signature."

You said this Dooks and I complied--but then you had to call me a liar. I put the link back up so that the reader can decide. I'd prefer you tell the truth about your worldview.

A few housekeeping items:

Technical stuff...Now, I cannot make revisions to my signature. I get a weird error.

"...[E]ven if me and Count Iblis shared some views back in the day it doesn't mean we are the same person."

You're the PC user and Dooku's the Apple user, am I right?

Response to comment [from a Satanist]:  "Who cares what you think?"

Not me (Ge 3:4). What does God think?

"You regularly lie about people here."

And I throw puppies off of bridges. Kill zem. Kill zem all.

Am I off your 'ignore' list?...Again.

Response to comment [from a Christian]:  "[Y]ou just did the scripture thing again. Same problem noted earlier."

What don't you like?

"You need to make the case, not simply declare it and slap a bit of scripture on the end that isn't necessarily in support."

I believe it does support my position. If you disagree, say why in any given example.
 

"I haven't been coy about my objection."

I agree.

"...[J]ust a misapplication..."

Let's get specific, Bob!.

"...[A]n assumption presented as an argument, without connective tissue."

The tissue connects to my mind. If you differ, provide an argument.

"I reject declaration in lieu of argument."

Then argue against the declaration.

"A lawyer doesn't stand up before a jury and declare his client innocent or the other's guilty..."

"There's no lawyer. There's just you and me." ~ Jack Bauer.

We are witnesses not lawyers (2 Pe 1:16).

"...[i]f you want anyone else to share it you should and must establish its truth."

Agreed.

"So you're under the impression that people whose souls are endangered honestly misapprehend the truth?"

We are sinners and can get things wrong. People can be deceived (Ga 5:9).

"You don't think they're intentionally misleading anyone?"

Some, yes. Others, no.

See:

Satan Inc (TOL Heretics List )

"So associating scripture seems to be an attempt to drape the unestablished in an authority it has yet to merit."

I'm a hack to your mind.

"I think you have to make a case that the group you point to meets the description/failing noted by scripture..."

Agreed. My opinion is irrelevant. God's word is all important (Ps. 119:142, 151, 160).

"So says everyone pointing at the other guy..."

Christians point out the other guy to expose him (Eph 5:11). The other guy points to the Christian to to mimic him.

You don't counterfeit bubble gum wrappers. You counterfeit something of value. Christianity is of value so it has many counterfeits (Rogers, Ga 5:9).

Response to comment [from other]:  "Wiz reported you for spamming the boards with multiple threads on the same topic..."

Same topic (creation). Different papers.

"...[W]ith nothing but myriad, epic cut 'n' pastes..."

If you hate evidence you can always read elsewhere.

By the way, why do you read anything I post if you believe I am a liar? If you and the Satanist are right, I am not to be trusted.

"...that breached copyright restrictions..."

AIG permits certain excerpts from their site.

"...and no actual dialogue."

I've never posted a response.

"About the only thing you have learned from your last sojourn is not to repeat the same."

Did you get your way in the end, bunny? And you're still not happy. What can we do to calm your nerves?

"The amount of people who visit your site is irrelevant."

Agreed.

"You're misrepresenting these people without any evidence."

Disagree.

"Their own words actually vindicate them..."

A pagan would say that.

"...nobody else reaches the same bizarre conclusions."

Ad Populum (appeal to common belief (Ex 23:2).

Response to comment [from a Christian]:  [Valor, Dean of Students quote]:  "Whoa!  That is great food for thought and application!"

It's all about attitude.

Response to comment [from a Christian]:  "...[H]ere's a crazy notion: why don't we let everyone define themselves..."

Great idea. Let's believe all that they say about God, too (Eph 5:11). Let's follow them all the way to hell.

"...and debate the merits..."

Imagine that.

"...[S]ee what they have to say about a given topic....If someone tells me they're a vegetarian and then start thread after thread about the joy of barbecue, it will out, won't it?

Have you noticed that the "Christian" tends to agree with the Satanist time and time again? Ga 5:9, Eph 5:11.

"I don't see what your practice in regard to signature links is going to accomplish other than making you look obsessive and a bit peculiar, at best. So why keep on with it?

People should know when they are chatting with wolves in sheep's clothing (Mt 7:15).

Response to comment [from a Christian]:  "...[M]any people can see through his fraudulent act..."

Maybe lies are more appealing? Jer 5:31.

Response to comment [from other]:  "[That ol' chestnut] You mean the truth?"

By truth do you mean truth or truth truth? Jn 18:38.

Response to comment [from a Christian]:  "So if I find a tendency in any Christian to agree with a Satanist on any matter then that Christian is not a Christian? Or is it a percentage of the time that you are referring to?"

Is this a formula of yours?

A "Christian" is not a Christian if he is not a Christian (1 Jn 5:12, 3:14, Phil 2:2, 1 Pe 3:8)

Response to comment [from a Christian]:  "Truth is truth."

Yep. And where we differ with God--we are wrong not him (Ac 17:11). 

Response to comment [from a Christian]:  [ You've found me out. In reality, I'm a humanoid, blood-sucking worm. ] No you're not, SD.  But too much anger or neg thoughts are not good for us.

Thank God for church (1 Pe 3:8, Eph 2:16).

"I don't know if one can forgive these bimbos nor if they would even want forgiveness in this lifetime..."

Noah convinced 7 people (2 Pe 2:5). If you enter eternity with your family, you're doing well (2 Cor 5:11, Mt 7:13).

Response to comment [from a Christian]:  "[Jer 5:31]I didn't realize how much of a Pharisee you really are, you and your minions!"

You don't think people love lies? Jer 5:31, 17:9.

Response to comment [from a Christian]:  "....[I]f I believe the guys riding around the town square during the holiday parade are Masons I'm endangering my soul?"

Do you hang out with Masons? 1 Cor 15:33.

"You have this odd habit of attempting to connect disparate things by simply jamming them into the same sentence."

What sentence do you dislike?

"Sometimes you do it with scripture..."

What sentence do you dislike?

"To illustrate: it's like saying "capitalism is evil" then following it with Romans 6:23."

Your example would demonstrate biblically illiteracy.

"They both have to do with wages, but...Don't have to."

You reject my point.

"[Y]ou haven't demonstrated the truth of more than your perception by declaring it."

People's posts are reflections of their perceptions.

"...[I]f a Satanist says the sky is blue and a member of the body believes it to be pink what should control, the truth or the belief?"

The truth. The sky is blue, by the way.

"I've also noticed that people sometimes have very different ideas about who the wolves are."

Some wolves think that the lambs are wolves. Some lambs think that the wolves are lambs (Lk 10:3). Lk 10:3 has to do with wolves and lambs not string cheese by the way.

"To one group it's the Catholics..."

To the group who believes Jn 14:6? To the group unashamed of the gospel of Jesus Christ? Ro 1:16. What do you think of this group?

"The only thing Christendom appears to agree on is who the Shepherd is."

Many people worship Jesus--just not the Jesus of Scripture (Jer 9:24).

Response to comment [from a Christian]:  "Do you love lies, SD?"

No.

Response to comment [from a Christian]:  "[Do people love lies? Jer 5:31.] Yes they do. Does my butt look big in these slacks?"

May we see a picture?

"...[Y]ou and I are not the Moral Arbiter."

Pr 31:9.

"That would be God."

Do you serve him or just raisin cakes? Hos 3:1.

"I like you best when you dig up facts on dicey propositions/situations and present them to us to be examined."

I was banned for sharing papers for discusion from AIG. They must have been too persuasive.

"When you are careful to separate fact from opinion you are showing respect to your audience."

What you call respect, I call compromise (Hos 3:1 ).

Response to comment [from a Christian]:  "I must live my God-given truth and you must live yours."

Do you believe in absolute truth?

"God's truth is eternal and unchanging and stedfast, yet, we each view it from our own perspective."

Where we differ from God, should our position change?

"I'm not going to lose sleep or heaven over things/issues which are non-salvific."

Neither am I.

"Take care of the down side. The upside will take care of itself." ~ Donald Trump Mt 6:34

"...[Y]ou smell sulphurous fumes whilst I smell the bread of heaven."

γνῶθι σεαυτόν Hos 3:1.

Response to comment [from other]:  "There was no reason to spam the boards..."

What you call spam I call evidence. You got your way. You're still not happy? What can we do to make you happy?

"...cut and paste essays on thirteen separate threads."

I know you had a hard time defending against the evidence. It's ok. You can come out from under your woobie. Bad threads all gone now.

"Yeah, c[u]s AIG and gotquestions.org count as "evidence"."

Bad threads all gone.

"What do you mean by me "and the satanist"? Who here actually buys your crap about Kmo and PB?"

Granite is the Satanist. He's upgraded to mere atheist now--although he never explained his conversion...--Anywho, as hard as it is to go on after being rebuked by him...I must.

"It would be me "and the vast majority" of this forum who think you're full of it."

Don't be like that Bun, Bun.

"It's one thing to harbour personal notions about other people. It's quite another to broadcast them as supposed *fact*."

I pointed out my observation. Accept it or reject it.

"This is what makes you a willful liar."

How dare I observe and make these observations known.

"You have no evidence apart from your own whims."

Let the reader decide.
 

"If we followed your example we'd be persecuting people for being presumed guilty instead of innocent."

We are guilty (Ro 3:23, Jn 3:18).

"...[Y]ou were bombarding us..."

You could have asked for a pacifier.

"While folk were asking you for your own personal understanding..."

Are you unaware of my position?

"...[Y]ou were busy starting part 12 of the same poxy series."

I get a little excited--that's true.

"...When you did *respond* it was invariably another cut n paste...that is not dialogue."

That's evidence. You're still not happy? Bybee said I'd be loved if I dug up evidence.

"I have no desire to see people banned SD but you needed reigning in."

You love me. You really love me.

I'm like you. I don't like seeing people banned. It makes TOL seem like all of the other religious debate sites. Maybe it's because I've been banned from so many other sites myself. I'm sure they've got rules that they must adhere to and they'd like to keep it clean; far enough, but all in all I prefer people speaking their minds.

I did not care for KMO's gloating over the ASC ban. "That's like summer vacation--no class." ~ Fat Albert.

"The fact is you've provided no proof for your claims."

Would you like their IP addresses?

Response to comment [from a Christian]:  "...I go after hardheartedness.  What is that not the best approach?"

God uses many approaches. He makes hearts like Jeremiah and he makes livers like Ezekiel.

Will you allow for differences in the body?

"SD Ive got to go now if you answer me I will come back later -I hope "

"Come back...come back..." ~ Rose, Titanic.

Response to comment [from other]:  "When you start thread after thread on a topic that could have been quite easily contained in one..."

You're a young earth creationist now?   

"...[T]hen it amounts to spam..."

You should have said the debate was settled.  We can all go home now.

"...It's not as though the owners of this site are unsympathetic to creationism but you were beyond the pale."

You got your way and you're still not happy? May I recommend a chamomile tea?

The only thing I regret is that I never had the opportunity to discuss communal nutrition in ants. It pains me deeply.

"...[Y]ou demonstrated zero understanding of the actual science involved."

I can't understand anything.

"Whenever you were challenged to show some scientific understanding (and bothered to actually return to the thread) you simply did the same tired pastes."

How can I show understanding if I cannot understand?

"There's folk here who are obviously accomplished in science."

We call them mad scientists (Pr 3:5).

"...[T]hey've already demonstrated they have a working knowledge of the topic at hand."

...Then you can go get drunk and fornicate?

"Christians, atheists, conservatives, liberals alike think your claims are absurd."

Ad Populum (appeal to common belief) 

"Name me one person here who thinks the same as you regarding PB and Kmo."

Ad Populum (appeal to common belief) 

[We are guilty (Ro 3:23, Jn 3:18).] "Do you think it would be fair if you were locked up until your innocence had been established?"

God's judgments are fair (Le 26:14-16; 2Ch 7:19,20) and you are not innocent (Ro 3:23, Jn 3:18) but Alate_One may have may have scientific data that tells you otherwise (Jer 5:31).

Response to comment [from a Christian]:  "[Let's be specific] Bob?"

A quote from the movie Phenomenon.

"...[W]hat's with the princess bit?"

A few housekeeping items:

My abbreviation for: "Facts...just the facts ma'am," and wide loads (); the sanctimonious (); "You've used just a fallacious argument." (); "Moving on..." ().

"[W]hy should I do more than you do? It's your case to make or, if you don't, mine to point out that you haven't yet."

Or we disagree.  Covetousness is evil (1 Tim. 6:9–11) and it is never satisfied (Hab. 2:9).

"I'm a lawyer and have been for a long while..."

Q: What do you call a smiling, sober, courteous person at a bar association convention?
A: The caterer.

"...That means I'm trained to think about problems of evidence, possess sharpened and particularly focused critical thinking skills required by my trade, and have ample experience with making and defeating cases, examining evidence for validity, etc. But the point is that you are arguing, as a layman, a matter that must and should be established before the jury of your peers by the setting out of a case, evidence, and a conclusion in keeping with a reasoned methodology. Until you manage that you can't be distinguished from the next guy willing to say what suits him, however convicted you may feel internally about your position."

I'm glad that you are a good lawyer.  We could present all the evidence in the world--and if we are not :banned: banned--people will still find a way to reject Jesus (Jn 3:19).  As my pastor likes to say, "If I can talk you into something, someone a whole lot smarter than me can talk you out of it."  The Bible is true.  It is the Holy Spirit who takes the things of God (1 Co 2:10,13) and makes them real to the believer (Jn 14:26; 16:13).  We give out the word of God.  What people do with it is their business.  Adrian Rogers said:  "A Christian with a witness in his heart is never at the mercy of a man with an argument in his mouth (1 Jn 5:10), Jn 9:25)."

Response to comment [from other]:  [You're a young earth creationist now?] "Nope."

God created the world in six literal days (Ex 20:11; 31:17).  Why don't you believe him?  Jn 3:12.

God is holy (Ex 15:11; 1 Sa 2:2).  We are not (Ro 3:23).  No good work can save you from the certainty of hell (Isa 64:6, Jn 3:18).  Humble yourself (Jas 4:10).

[Lack of understanding] "You show understanding through dialogue..."

It is possible that I cannot comprehend what I read. It is also possible that I can.

[Mad scientists (Pr 3:5)]  "...I guess one has to be mad to have a degree in molecular biology et al..."

Is Walt Brown mad?  

[Then you can go get drunk and fornicate?] "What are you on about now?"

What stands between you and Jesus?  It's not information in a genome or finger bones arrangements in theropods.

"...[P]lenty here have known both PB and Kmo for a lot longer than the wonderful day you joined the boards..."

Wonder why Dooku bugged out when I challenged him? Has anyone seen or heard from Dooks since he was called out on postings as a "Christian" (KMO) and an "atheist" (Count)? They'd make a good president.

...crickets...

"A common belief is that people who accuse should back up their claims..."

I have made you aware of my observation. If you don't like it, ask Knight to remove it. Sometimes he agrees with you. You don't mind people being deceived (Jer 5:31). I do. I prefer people know when they are speaking with an antichrist.

See:

The Jesus test, the gospel test, and the fruit test

"You don't therefore you willfully misrepresent people without any substantial evidence."

I ask people to view their writings and see if they recognize a spirit of antichrist. 

"Do you think criminal law should presume guilt first or innocence until proof is provided to establish either?  Yes or no?"

I ask the reader to examine the proof and decide for him/herself.  You, a defender of antichrists, would like the question to go away. These people made their views known and they can stand by them.  If a person claims to be a Christian, it is reasonable to expect him to act like one.  Jer 17:9. 

Response to comment [from a Christian]:  "[M]y butt looks fat because it is fat!  I serve God and molasses cookies too! Don't like raisin cakes."

They pull up a chair and sit your molasses behind right down (Ps 26:5).

"Have you read David Copperfield?"

Yes.

"There is a character in there that reminds me of someone..."

Who?

[Personality traits] "Yes of course I will!"

I know you will but I had to put the question out there.  Some Christians only like those who are like themselves (Rom. 15:5–7).

Response to comment [from other]:  "Now serpentdove is going to pretend that she has IP addresses?  Riiiight."

No. But, I bet the thought scared a few people.

I've been through several computers. How 'bout you? It wouldn't much matter.

Response to comment [from other]:  [Would you like their IP addresses?] "If that is your proof, we would like them."

If I had their IP addresses, couldn't they log in from any other computer any other time anyway?    

"Do you have their IP addresses or is this more posturing, deflection and deceit?"

No.

"...[A]ntiChrist stuff you're railing against......the stuff glass houses are made with."

How would a pagan, heathen know that? 1 Cor 2:14. Explain what "other" religion you believe. You could be like Granite and upgrade yourself to gain other's respect. The "Satanist" title didn't work out too well for him. Will we see "Christian" as your identification soon?

P.S. No one likes a tattle tale (Rev. 12:10).

Response to comment [from a Christian]:  "Well not everyone can be as inclusive and loving as you, SD...not if we want the species to continue at any rate.  I kid because I love."

I die a little on the inside. --Oh never mind--that would be hopeless Graniteheart (Eph. 2:12).

Response to comment [from a Christian]:  "IP addresses are part of a regional pool of adresses if they are dynamic (which is the case most of the time). Anyone from Altlanta south who has Comcast (when dynamic IP address is specified during configuration) is given one IP address every time they sign on from a pool of IP adresses assigned to that hub. They are exchanged every time a person signs on. So IOW, I might use an IP address today that is used by someone 400 miles away tomorrow..."

"I think he's talking to you." ~ Homer Simpson

"Jesus loves you, but everyone else thinks you're a jerk."

You're almost as good as KMO--just have to sharpen your horns a little.

Response to comment [from a "Christian"]:  "The link doesn't work."

I fixed the link.  http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/search.php?searchid=700578 People can decide if you argue like this atheist and if there are any similarities.  Why do you/did you argue like this in '09?  Any change of heart?  

"I never remember a TOLer named VanAnne."

A few housekeeping items:

I'm known as a "one post wonder" Jul07. 

Response to comment [from other]:  "Your "observation" is not proof."

I did not claim that my observation was proof. You may observe for yourself. Let the reader decide.

Response to comment [from a Christian]:  "...[Y]ou are not someone to be trusted..."

Let the reader decide.

"Your actions and words to others speak louder than your claims about your spiritual beliefs. IOW, the proof is in the pudding."

Mmm, pudding.

Response to comment [from a Christian]:  [Let the reader decide.] "We have."

You have.

Response to comment [from other]:  "Pretend a poster new to TOL notices your signature and asks you "[Y]ou think that PB and Gamera are the same poster? What makes you think so?"  How do you respond?

I'd say I think that PB, Gamera and Taikoo are the same person based on their writings. I'd ask them to read what they've written and see what they think.

"My sperm cells are mine (Gamera)."

"Also, why did you imply that you had their IP addresses? Deceit?"

I did not imply. I wondered what you would accept as evidence. IP addresses are irrelevant.